Going Underground.

Posted: October 25, 2011 by lwildingsmith in The Tunnel

Some ideas I’ve had about Greenwich Tunnel:

Having visited Greenwich Tunnel before as an underground commuter, I somewhat knew the space without experiencing it. These are some thoughts I have had since leaving the tunnel on Friday.

-          The aural quality of the space is quite overbearing. The sound echoes throughout and I think this idea was cemented in my mind by the artist Sue Cohen who spoke of her work within the tunnel.

 Sue Cohen If Walls Had Ears (2006)

-          If we then think of other tunnels that are in use, we see again the possibilities that these types of spaces can produce. The Old Vic Tunnels under Waterloo Station is perhaps a current example of using underground, space slightly hidden from view as a platform for something.  http://oldvictunnels.com/about-us/

-          I was also reminded of a piece by Via Lewandowsky ‘Gallery of the Missing’.  It is a glass sculpture that uses voices to describe works of art that are ‘missing’. You wear headphones and move along the glass wall and intersect the sound of different stories/descriptions. It is through movement that the audience gives the potential for the voices to be heard. I think this piece may also have questions of space; the space in which the audience moves, the empty space in front of the sculpture.

 Via Lewandowsky Gallery of the Missing

-          This idea of ‘empty space’ led me to ideas of the missing part of the tunnel, the part that was bombed and remade.  It just made me think of this space as ‘empty shelves’ – as though implicitly showing what was lost during the Blitz, and an event that decimated London. This is in contrast to the explicit representation of loss in Berlin – the book burning memorial in Bebelplatz, also using the metaphor of empty shelves.  I think the emptiness of these ‘shelves’ also expresses the transitory nature of the audience/commuters in the tunnel , much like in rented or temporary accommodation we tend not to leave our possessions. I think this space within the tunnel perhaps also alludes to ideas of a cabinet of curiosities, precisely in its lack of collection??

Comments
  1. sorry, I didn’t sign it. Lydia.

  2. davidlmartin says:

    Lydia, this is a fabulous post – engaging, creative and written with care. Well done.

    I particularly liked the final section where you were riffing off an old standard of yours (from your earlier work on the Jewish Museum) around the notion of absence. You’re the first person to pick up on, and run with, the ‘missing’ bit of the tunnel. Of course this section is actually an ‘adding’, not a ‘missing’, and is also what the skeleton of the rest of the tunnel would look like if you took the titled walls off it. But there is something about the intrusion of the skeleton back into the tunnel that evokes absence; that strips one set of associations of the tunnel by stripping the tiles off (public cleanliness, hygiene and Victorian sensibilities) and replaces them with another (the need for fortitude and reinforcement – both literally and psychologically – in a time of post-war reconstruction).

    If the tunnel were a body it would be the abject body of Bataille: monstrously subterranean in its inversion of inner and outer, it shits out a daily load of transients; pineal eye winking seductively at us all the while…

What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s